Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 20:26:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C702EA50EFA2D3A31DFB8BFE25F83956638C105BDD0C4AC87B38894FCE8E3ADA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN To current proposed note: This tweet is the authors opinion, "called 'lighthearted'" - Speculative "has good taste" - Opinion, not fact "NASA also. . ." - Irrelevant "Yet user didn't care" - Argumentative/speculative Source only links to the irrelevant statement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845771431436780009
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C702EA50EFA2D3A31DFB8BFE25F83956638C105BDD0C4AC87B38894FCE8E3ADA
  • createdAtMillis - 1728937619416
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845771431436780009C702EA50EFA2D3A31DFB8BFE25F83956638C105BDD0C4AC87B38894FCE8E3ADA