Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 16:01:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 970AB57C34A951D21CBEFE5EA6266DBC08DFE662140E632C2983966035C91E3C
Participant Details

Original Note:

A note is not needed on this post. Proposed notes questioning the source are speculative. An investigative report for a local Denver news station responded to the account with questions for the company, indicating that it is genuine. https://x.com/nataliechuck/status/1845178251271881038?s=46&t=YAGHQH_xHSt0O-0RKJOrhQ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1845766773666164844
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 970AB57C34A951D21CBEFE5EA6266DBC08DFE662140E632C2983966035C91E3C
createdAtMillis - 1728921683014
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1845766773666164844970AB57C34A951D21CBEFE5EA6266DBC08DFE662140E632C2983966035C91E3C