Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 19:33:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AC6875941BA651AA1894658F379EA86B7895AB00AC365C2C5DA664E73BE98954
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN — there is no reason to assume this isn't a true story. Just because someone mentions a brand in their tweet, that doesn't mean it's an advertisement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845759404957909232
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AC6875941BA651AA1894658F379EA86B7895AB00AC365C2C5DA664E73BE98954
  • createdAtMillis - 1728934385287
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845759404957909232AC6875941BA651AA1894658F379EA86B7895AB00AC365C2C5DA664E73BE98954