Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 02:11:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E2B22999DFE4EB85112CF4FE880AA9F473D85FEF6422B2C29D7ACF8CDB4B95C
Participant Details

Original Note:

この画像はAI再生画像だと思われ、その点がこのポスト自体に明記されていません。 背景などに不自然な点があればAI再生画像と疑われます。 https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUC12AQW0S3A510C2000000/ この画像の場合、左端の2つの線路の幅が異なっているなどの不自然な点があります。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845641494679707689
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E2B22999DFE4EB85112CF4FE880AA9F473D85FEF6422B2C29D7ACF8CDB4B95C
  • createdAtMillis - 1728871891115
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18456414946797076899E2B22999DFE4EB85112CF4FE880AA9F473D85FEF6422B2C29D7ACF8CDB4B95C