Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 04:22:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69DF8E72F4560A9902F3714A88B2997D219F1B1CFD98881A8F74D2B7E1B7B39F
Participant Details

Original Note:

当ポストの告訴状(自称)において様式要件を全く満たしておらず、話題性を考慮すると虚偽事項の流布とも捉えられる行為です。 具体例を挙げると、右上記載の日付は記載日ではなく提出日を記載することとなっています。 以下 詳細な様式(リード法律事務所HPより引用) https://lead-law-office.com/keijikokuso/knowledge/kakikata/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845639102114545956
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 69DF8E72F4560A9902F3714A88B2997D219F1B1CFD98881A8F74D2B7E1B7B39F
  • createdAtMillis - 1728879748634
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184563910211454595669DF8E72F4560A9902F3714A88B2997D219F1B1CFD98881A8F74D2B7E1B7B39F