Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 03:23:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4611A091392E06BC8599DD33AAC6B9F92433ED8A01C9BC33F8BE1D33C27F9F9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXNASDG18H11_Y4A710C1CR8000/ 最高裁の判決が「外国人を生活保護の対象にする法令も存在しない」 と言う内容に謝りはなく、コミュニティノートを追加する必要はありません。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845621899856085080
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4611A091392E06BC8599DD33AAC6B9F92433ED8A01C9BC33F8BE1D33C27F9F9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1728876208561
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18456218998560850804611A091392E06BC8599DD33AAC6B9F92433ED8A01C9BC33F8BE1D33C27F9F9A