Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-15 09:40:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 632B163443EE6195979B13E934D66857F4B2ACFE2BECCE34EE0839E110CEEB7F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN vague opinions about the “spirit” of the guidelines are not facts. The fact is that the guidelines DO permit this. Take opinions about the subjective “spirit” of the guidelines (a fair criticism) the comments where they belong, per the CN’s own guidelines https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845575564595482874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 632B163443EE6195979B13E934D66857F4B2ACFE2BECCE34EE0839E110CEEB7F
  • createdAtMillis - 1728985242311
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845575564595482874632B163443EE6195979B13E934D66857F4B2ACFE2BECCE34EE0839E110CEEB7F