Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 05:19:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B1B71E30888916555AB7C3622DEA702DF12E95F3F1072542C6CB01F0F5F089A1
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'utilisation du conditionnel ne change rien. À la différence de l'injure, les propos diffamatoires portent sur un fait, un acte précis, vérifiable lié à la personne visée. https://www.avocatgoudard.com/guide/avocat-penaliste/avocat-en-droit-penal-des-personnes/atteinte-a-la-vie-privee/diffamation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845530691515130259
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B1B71E30888916555AB7C3622DEA702DF12E95F3F1072542C6CB01F0F5F089A1
  • createdAtMillis - 1728883181598
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845530691515130259B1B71E30888916555AB7C3622DEA702DF12E95F3F1072542C6CB01F0F5F089A1