Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 05:09:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9457BC6CB8C81AB1353E385B4D00855033A87330F5E462B0CF19032359E9176B
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'utilisation du conditionnel ne change rien. À la différence de l'injure, les propos diffamatoires portent sur un fait, un acte précis, vérifiable lié à la personne visée. https://www.avocatgoudard.com/guide/avocat-penaliste/avocat-en-droit-penal-des-personnes/atteinte-a-la-vie-privee/diffamation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845530691515130259
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9457BC6CB8C81AB1353E385B4D00855033A87330F5E462B0CF19032359E9176B
  • createdAtMillis - 1728882576694
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18455306915151302599457BC6CB8C81AB1353E385B4D00855033A87330F5E462B0CF19032359E9176B