Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 07:25:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA2E43BC9EF3B84C1A99720304E63BAE5FFB2F19B708F9A3E8DA8D7EF94C7781
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. There is no evidence provided that the account is not the property manangement company in question,just noting these are its only tweets. The company may have decided to get onto Twitter because this specific situation has become unteniable, an equally reasonable conclusion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845522986436120954
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA2E43BC9EF3B84C1A99720304E63BAE5FFB2F19B708F9A3E8DA8D7EF94C7781
  • createdAtMillis - 1728890730734
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845522986436120954DA2E43BC9EF3B84C1A99720304E63BAE5FFB2F19B708F9A3E8DA8D7EF94C7781