Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 19:02:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9EA4A56199E8517851671A35808678C60C096F35B7548B4A00E1FD900FA106CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. There is no evidence provided that the account is not the property manangement company in question,just noting these are its only tweets. The company may have decided to get onto Twitter because this specific situation has become unteniable, an equally reasonable conclusion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845522986436120954
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9EA4A56199E8517851671A35808678C60C096F35B7548B4A00E1FD900FA106CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1728932551178
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18455229864361209549EA4A56199E8517851671A35808678C60C096F35B7548B4A00E1FD900FA106CE