Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 09:21:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 606DC3FEF859B1BD318B2AD7F1D2916C2CAEFBF7A503241E7B2F72989342877A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. There is no evidence provided that the account is not the property manangement company in question,just noting these are its only tweets. The company may have decided to get onto Twitter because this specific situation has become unteniable, an equally reasonable conclusion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845522986436120954
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 606DC3FEF859B1BD318B2AD7F1D2916C2CAEFBF7A503241E7B2F72989342877A
  • createdAtMillis - 1728897685298
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845522986436120954606DC3FEF859B1BD318B2AD7F1D2916C2CAEFBF7A503241E7B2F72989342877A