Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 02:08:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F937C62294549D25BCA71F31C2DC392C1C2E482932A68CA0405DC2E1D82CFD54
Participant Details

Original Note:

At this time there are no reports from authorities or credible news organizations that support these claims. The source of these claims is a anonymous social media user @DocNetyoutube who posted the allegations without any documentation or other substantiation. https://x.com/DocNetyoutube/status/1845106539410956715

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1845217011338711517
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F937C62294549D25BCA71F31C2DC392C1C2E482932A68CA0405DC2E1D82CFD54
createdAtMillis - 1728871695290
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1845217011338711517F937C62294549D25BCA71F31C2DC392C1C2E482932A68CA0405DC2E1D82CFD54