Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-13 02:25:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D8B6F14D296611EC088F66E6A845FA7D9CE14484127EE4CC6EDCDBEA69EFEB5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

At this time there are no reports from authorities or credible news organizations that support these claims. The source of these claims is a anonymous social media user @DocNetyoutube who posted the allegations without any documentation or other substantiation. https://x.com/DocNetyoutube/status/1845106539410956715

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1845215975916044643
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D8B6F14D296611EC088F66E6A845FA7D9CE14484127EE4CC6EDCDBEA69EFEB5F
createdAtMillis - 1728786327153
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1845215975916044643D8B6F14D296611EC088F66E6A845FA7D9CE14484127EE4CC6EDCDBEA69EFEB5F