Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-13 05:46:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85F9C4AAA0E112514B3DDDBBB58F3E243C35D65E32F191F6E9657F7DFD53EE25
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ballistics experts have examined the photos in the article and concluded the wounds could not have been caused by a snipers as the article claims. The sculls and the bullets in the x-rays have no damage, suggesting the photos may be complete fabrications https://x.com/CherylWroteIt/status/1844907195953185093?t=tvzFOue_nLT2KDwOxCXKQg&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845204435317948592
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85F9C4AAA0E112514B3DDDBBB58F3E243C35D65E32F191F6E9657F7DFD53EE25
  • createdAtMillis - 1728798377694
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184520443531794859285F9C4AAA0E112514B3DDDBBB58F3E243C35D65E32F191F6E9657F7DFD53EE25