Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-12 21:08:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AFF5BABE4F4BAC8667CA703C79E5BED1E21FFA7731794E8274FDC4C2823C9644
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The number of genders is an opinion based upon one's beliefs. This is not a good use of community notes. Plus, Scientific American is no longer a reliable source, unfortunately, as they prioritize activism over science. https://www.amazon.com/SCIENTIFIC-AMERICAN-MAGAZINE-SPECIAL-SPRING/dp/B0B3816K4K

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1845154993311203783
participantId -
raterParticipantId - AFF5BABE4F4BAC8667CA703C79E5BED1E21FFA7731794E8274FDC4C2823C9644
createdAtMillis - 1728767318090
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1845154993311203783AFF5BABE4F4BAC8667CA703C79E5BED1E21FFA7731794E8274FDC4C2823C9644