Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-14 00:08:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF63C3D4CCD31DBB47F1469488E130B771260EA3F7BDC222E29FE966580B4A9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The number of genders is an opinion based upon one's beliefs. This is not a good use of community notes. Plus, Scientific American is no longer a reliable source, unfortunately, as they prioritize activism over science. https://www.amazon.com/SCIENTIFIC-AMERICAN-MAGAZINE-SPECIAL-SPRING/dp/B0B3816K4K

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845154993311203783
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF63C3D4CCD31DBB47F1469488E130B771260EA3F7BDC222E29FE966580B4A9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1728864520353
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845154993311203783AF63C3D4CCD31DBB47F1469488E130B771260EA3F7BDC222E29FE966580B4A9A