Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-12 15:05:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F106B6B5DC58BE7B0AE3A27BC9C75BD5B21717B300235DB04AFFC6A8C0809DDD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original poster was stating his actions, and saying he has documented them. The suggested note just argues that Walz was well-intentioned, but does not address the post itself.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845116646102335608
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F106B6B5DC58BE7B0AE3A27BC9C75BD5B21717B300235DB04AFFC6A8C0809DDD
  • createdAtMillis - 1728745531123
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845116646102335608F106B6B5DC58BE7B0AE3A27BC9C75BD5B21717B300235DB04AFFC6A8C0809DDD