Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-13 01:49:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E19EC5195FE1DC5ADF427447469144DA2D19D9E86369EB33EFD98D6F3F328707
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original poster was stating his actions, and saying he has documented them. The suggested note just argues that Walz was well-intentioned, but does not address the post itself.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845116646102335608
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E19EC5195FE1DC5ADF427447469144DA2D19D9E86369EB33EFD98D6F3F328707
  • createdAtMillis - 1728784188182
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845116646102335608E19EC5195FE1DC5ADF427447469144DA2D19D9E86369EB33EFD98D6F3F328707