Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-13 03:25:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57B33D824D8DF5F7B8B85D9B74980F459F170F21231E5EC099DCE36E8F9E2C0B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original poster was stating his actions, and saying he has documented them. The suggested note just argues that Walz was well-intentioned, but does not address the post itself.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845116646102335608
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57B33D824D8DF5F7B8B85D9B74980F459F170F21231E5EC099DCE36E8F9E2C0B
  • createdAtMillis - 1728789910437
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184511664610233560857B33D824D8DF5F7B8B85D9B74980F459F170F21231E5EC099DCE36E8F9E2C0B