Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-12 14:29:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CC6C916682B1F5EEB9606DC9EDC04E06C37B7ABD160022BCA33FB29B200E3DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Important context: Multiple experts that analyzed the X-ray scans that appear in the article stated that the images are fake. https://x.com/CherylWroteIt/status/1844907195953185093 https://x.com/er_tramonto/status/1845056445818994821 https://x.com/jerseyisland/status/1844781789308428332 https://x.com/ZemerSat/status/1844791056841273524

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1845094161873080384
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0CC6C916682B1F5EEB9606DC9EDC04E06C37B7ABD160022BCA33FB29B200E3DA
createdAtMillis - 1728743367582
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18450941618730803840CC6C916682B1F5EEB9606DC9EDC04E06C37B7ABD160022BCA33FB29B200E3DA