Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-12 12:31:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 600FD0363C54FF998A92BA8063786EDEE94D51BFDDDA7E4B6EB475D435244AD2
Participant Details

Original Note:

この件に関しては既にファクトチェック記事が出ており、この投稿が残ってないし、事務所にも否定されているのは勿論のこと、こうした投稿を著名人がすれば話題になるはずの、投稿も残っておらず、捏造であると結論されています。 https://www.factcheckcenter.jp/fact-check/politics/false-claims-yoshifu-arita-post/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1845050491270725960
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 600FD0363C54FF998A92BA8063786EDEE94D51BFDDDA7E4B6EB475D435244AD2
  • createdAtMillis - 1728736315390
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1845050491270725960600FD0363C54FF998A92BA8063786EDEE94D51BFDDDA7E4B6EB475D435244AD2