Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-12 11:03:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11073B02FDCAA136EC9A75D019F34E7ADA003DE2BCBDD8A9D9BB8522CE256183
Participant Details

Original Note:

車の持ち主により迷惑駐車行為があったことは事実であり、また車の持ち主から訴訟を匂わせるメッセージがあったことも概ね事実と考えられます。謝罪があったか、持ち主が迷惑駐車を認識していたかがポストの論点ではないため、コミュニティノートは不要と考えます。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844994254629896370
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11073B02FDCAA136EC9A75D019F34E7ADA003DE2BCBDD8A9D9BB8522CE256183
  • createdAtMillis - 1728731028405
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184499425462989637011073B02FDCAA136EC9A75D019F34E7ADA003DE2BCBDD8A9D9BB8522CE256183