Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-13 10:01:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 30629BA0104C93FA429BFB0584EBC9DB0A4100372A646DE75A1A734A8CFE049A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: both sides criticising something is not proof of neutrality. That’s a classic logical fallacy. One or both sides maybe criticising in bad faith, they may be wrong, they may be subject to confirmation bias.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844981729267716393
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 30629BA0104C93FA429BFB0584EBC9DB0A4100372A646DE75A1A734A8CFE049A
  • createdAtMillis - 1728813702877
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184498172926771639330629BA0104C93FA429BFB0584EBC9DB0A4100372A646DE75A1A734A8CFE049A