Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-12 04:47:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 441E27D5EFE3CCCA8A1F26E09FDF64220A52DA232C26618F86C0D1F83D5F7E9F
Participant Details

Original Note:

本訴訟は「宿舎の無償使用期間終了後も退去しなかった」ために都が訴えたものです。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20241007-2NJZ77LSRNNKNM6WB7ISDK2HDA/ 判決では人権侵害は認定されていません。 都が使用権を持つ不動産を不正に利用するものがいる状況は都民にとってデメリットです。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844855744086319343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 441E27D5EFE3CCCA8A1F26E09FDF64220A52DA232C26618F86C0D1F83D5F7E9F
  • createdAtMillis - 1728708450436
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1844855744086319343441E27D5EFE3CCCA8A1F26E09FDF64220A52DA232C26618F86C0D1F83D5F7E9F