Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-12 05:13:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DFFCFB99AF615403921AAF44F089F1CDE1FFF02536073EF7677FA1C31A288F4A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Despite the ridiculousness of the claim, he's talking about the future, not the past. The proposed CN talks about how this has not happened in the past. That's irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844805223606632835
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DFFCFB99AF615403921AAF44F089F1CDE1FFF02536073EF7677FA1C31A288F4A
  • createdAtMillis - 1728710032338
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1844805223606632835DFFCFB99AF615403921AAF44F089F1CDE1FFF02536073EF7677FA1C31A288F4A