Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-12 05:13:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C7673E857C1B21FC9F2BE4FDF23EC97AF17DE85360740A452E2C2B141026FC5D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Despite the ridiculousness of the claim, he's talking about the future, not the past. The proposed CN talks about how this has not happened in the past. That's irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844805223606632835
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C7673E857C1B21FC9F2BE4FDF23EC97AF17DE85360740A452E2C2B141026FC5D
  • createdAtMillis - 1728710005920
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1844805223606632835C7673E857C1B21FC9F2BE4FDF23EC97AF17DE85360740A452E2C2B141026FC5D