Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-11 20:22:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED90B6C2A9E74DCED58E5E999027F957956E0D635300C701FD097AC7B3DD9921
Participant Details

Original Note:

The point of this post is to show that google's algorithm is biased, which is election interference, unless the publisher notes them as "editorially" curated results. These articles are obviously falsely elevated to #1 results based purely on their SEO rules. https://www.google.com/intl/en/search/howsearchworks/how-search-works/ranking-results/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844797027881980036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED90B6C2A9E74DCED58E5E999027F957956E0D635300C701FD097AC7B3DD9921
  • createdAtMillis - 1728678154156
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1844797027881980036ED90B6C2A9E74DCED58E5E999027F957956E0D635300C701FD097AC7B3DD9921