Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-12 01:26:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E9996A813BF4F9A5B74D77D77C8DC418BC5A828401A50424567A47821A64063
Participant Details

Original Note:

The point of this post is to show that google's algorithm is biased, which is election interference, unless the publisher notes them as "editorially" curated results. These articles are obviously falsely elevated to #1 results based purely on their SEO rules. https://www.google.com/intl/en/search/howsearchworks/how-search-works/ranking-results/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844797027881980036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E9996A813BF4F9A5B74D77D77C8DC418BC5A828401A50424567A47821A64063
  • createdAtMillis - 1728696381930
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18447970278819800368E9996A813BF4F9A5B74D77D77C8DC418BC5A828401A50424567A47821A64063