Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-11 20:21:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1E510059B35646E4BC598D493602FB27334729473A7EA52111D27944CDA971F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The point of this post is to show that google's algorithm is biased, which is election interference, unless the publisher notes them as "editorially" curated results. These articles are obviously falsely elevated to #1 results based purely on their SEO rules. https://www.google.com/intl/en/search/howsearchworks/how-search-works/ranking-results/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844797027881980036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1E510059B35646E4BC598D493602FB27334729473A7EA52111D27944CDA971F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1728678065674
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18447970278819800361E510059B35646E4BC598D493602FB27334729473A7EA52111D27944CDA971F6