Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-12 10:32:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0989517449DE5FE25A10162CA24DFEA1D3CA29F65C0919A523DB814E0C367EF2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The point of this post is to show that google's algorithm is biased, which is election interference, unless the publisher notes them as "editorially" curated results. These articles are obviously falsely elevated to #1 results based purely on their SEO rules. https://www.google.com/intl/en/search/howsearchworks/how-search-works/ranking-results/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844797027881980036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0989517449DE5FE25A10162CA24DFEA1D3CA29F65C0919A523DB814E0C367EF2
  • createdAtMillis - 1728729160900
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18447970278819800360989517449DE5FE25A10162CA24DFEA1D3CA29F65C0919A523DB814E0C367EF2