Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-11 18:51:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F35322BC6812EC8F3D089D08968FBE717086F5E7EB5CE027CEA89FF901A0ED83
Participant Details

Original Note:

"This is a highly presumptuous argument, which assumes that Green Party voters would support Clinton by default, when in actuality, these voters were highly unlikely to vote for Clinton in the first place." https://truthout.org/articles/democrats-should-abandon-the-third-party-spoiler-argument/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844771226562040167
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F35322BC6812EC8F3D089D08968FBE717086F5E7EB5CE027CEA89FF901A0ED83
  • createdAtMillis - 1728672673888
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1844771226562040167F35322BC6812EC8F3D089D08968FBE717086F5E7EB5CE027CEA89FF901A0ED83