Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-11 18:54:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A82731A2382BDBD851BA6C987F89ED99B0B92AB765176C7A5B28310A492C2D4C
Participant Details

Original Note:

"This is a highly presumptuous argument, which assumes that Green Party voters would support Clinton by default, when in actuality, these voters were highly unlikely to vote for Clinton in the first place." https://truthout.org/articles/democrats-should-abandon-the-third-party-spoiler-argument/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844771226562040167
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A82731A2382BDBD851BA6C987F89ED99B0B92AB765176C7A5B28310A492C2D4C
  • createdAtMillis - 1728672897958
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1844771226562040167A82731A2382BDBD851BA6C987F89ED99B0B92AB765176C7A5B28310A492C2D4C