Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-11 18:30:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9687FAC9D4F55A16EC365C82C77C46512C2A490D90C3507D263C24B940C3B692
Participant Details

Original Note:

"This is a highly presumptuous argument, which assumes that Green Party voters would support Clinton by default, when in actuality, these voters were highly unlikely to vote for Clinton in the first place." https://truthout.org/articles/democrats-should-abandon-the-third-party-spoiler-argument/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844771226562040167
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9687FAC9D4F55A16EC365C82C77C46512C2A490D90C3507D263C24B940C3B692
  • createdAtMillis - 1728671446830
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18447712265620401679687FAC9D4F55A16EC365C82C77C46512C2A490D90C3507D263C24B940C3B692