Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-11 18:32:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 42FE67F9A01FBBD17370DFD7D570C7AAE3FF948CFE96AF41C1A91EDAAADB37E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

"This is a highly presumptuous argument, which assumes that Green Party voters would support Clinton by default, when in actuality, these voters were highly unlikely to vote for Clinton in the first place." https://truthout.org/articles/democrats-should-abandon-the-third-party-spoiler-argument/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844771226562040167
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 42FE67F9A01FBBD17370DFD7D570C7AAE3FF948CFE96AF41C1A91EDAAADB37E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1728671542606
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184477122656204016742FE67F9A01FBBD17370DFD7D570C7AAE3FF948CFE96AF41C1A91EDAAADB37E3