Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-13 08:19:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E53A325866E82FE7A7EE463DA3F99A03A9887449B4D06D81640C368048EBFE5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's a poorly done study that is more propaganda than science. The Cass Review is a real scientific review of the issue and it does not support these claims - https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844398064221470999
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E53A325866E82FE7A7EE463DA3F99A03A9887449B4D06D81640C368048EBFE5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1728807544258
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1844398064221470999E53A325866E82FE7A7EE463DA3F99A03A9887449B4D06D81640C368048EBFE5F