Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-11 01:51:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97278A1AD5F9755F52252097F4713B256CCF47DF8319ECAC6D6001A0E497FC7F
Participant Details

Original Note:

O próprio perfil do STF se contradiz ao afirmar que as determinações secretas eram para remoção de conteúdo, o que já seria nulo considerando a falta dos requisitos legais, e na mesma thread dizer que a ordem era pelo bloqueio de perfis inteiros, o que é ilegal. https://x.com/AlexandreFiles/status/1832103709842473150

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844388813528805827
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97278A1AD5F9755F52252097F4713B256CCF47DF8319ECAC6D6001A0E497FC7F
  • createdAtMillis - 1728611482502
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184438881352880582797278A1AD5F9755F52252097F4713B256CCF47DF8319ECAC6D6001A0E497FC7F