Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-11 18:18:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6064EB234C3BE92CB96539F4F1AF454AB5D3F87B356D28E7717EF484C56FC5E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

O perfil do STF mente e desinforma ao afirmar que a determinação era pela remoção de conteúdos. As ordens eram para a remoção de perfis inteiros. Ex: https://x.com/AlexandreFiles/status/1829980105567059997 A determinação para a exclusão de perfis inteiros é nula, por não ter previsão legal e por conta do art. 19, §§1º e 2º do MCI

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844387564180082729
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6064EB234C3BE92CB96539F4F1AF454AB5D3F87B356D28E7717EF484C56FC5E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1728670725458
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18443875641800827296064EB234C3BE92CB96539F4F1AF454AB5D3F87B356D28E7717EF484C56FC5E6