Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-11 18:06:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47095ABC28704EFCDCB5B2D162C2C60948250C1BF435336E76064CFFC61CBA9E
Participant Details

Original Note:

O perfil do STF mente e desinforma ao afirmar que a determinação era pela remoção de conteúdos. As ordens eram para a remoção de perfis inteiros. Ex: https://x.com/AlexandreFiles/status/1829980105567059997 A determinação para a exclusão de perfis inteiros é nula, por não ter previsão legal e por conta do art. 19, §§1º e 2º do MCI

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844387564180082729
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 47095ABC28704EFCDCB5B2D162C2C60948250C1BF435336E76064CFFC61CBA9E
  • createdAtMillis - 1728670014963
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184438756418008272947095ABC28704EFCDCB5B2D162C2C60948250C1BF435336E76064CFFC61CBA9E