Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-10 16:52:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0257D9BCBA68C8EDC49FF1274D8A851D1EAF3266FDA99BF5CE5E08E61E00403
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: the author of the above CN lies. The start of his linked paper starts with the disclaimer "Any views expressed here are the author’s and do not represent official views of NOAA or the U.S. government."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844373403542667462
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0257D9BCBA68C8EDC49FF1274D8A851D1EAF3266FDA99BF5CE5E08E61E00403
  • createdAtMillis - 1728579157414
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1844373403542667462A0257D9BCBA68C8EDC49FF1274D8A851D1EAF3266FDA99BF5CE5E08E61E00403