Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-10 19:09:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 881D393D2BFAD683F9B20C62DB572C2A9A4E16AB98C4A81810458B0C9AE821C6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: the author of the above CN lies. The start of his linked paper starts with the disclaimer "Any views expressed here are the author’s and do not represent official views of NOAA or the U.S. government."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844373403542667462
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 881D393D2BFAD683F9B20C62DB572C2A9A4E16AB98C4A81810458B0C9AE821C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1728587363202
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1844373403542667462881D393D2BFAD683F9B20C62DB572C2A9A4E16AB98C4A81810458B0C9AE821C6