Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-10 20:33:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4DF87A8A112AB21B6949C45E86156E5BA3857486FD30D233F1FCE4631FAB65B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: the author of the above CN lies. The start of his linked paper starts with the disclaimer "Any views expressed here are the author’s and do not represent official views of NOAA or the U.S. government."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844373403542667462
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4DF87A8A112AB21B6949C45E86156E5BA3857486FD30D233F1FCE4631FAB65B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1728592421447
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18443734035426674624DF87A8A112AB21B6949C45E86156E5BA3857486FD30D233F1FCE4631FAB65B1