Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-10 15:08:40 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 328858F4269CDB13216C8569A02F5E637DE1667DD1D849645364EEEF2947BF52
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: the author of the above CN lies. The start of his linked paper starts with the disclaimer "Any views expressed here are the author’s and do not represent official views of NOAA or the U.S. government."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844373403542667462
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 328858F4269CDB13216C8569A02F5E637DE1667DD1D849645364EEEF2947BF52
  • createdAtMillis - 1728572920668
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1844373403542667462328858F4269CDB13216C8569A02F5E637DE1667DD1D849645364EEEF2947BF52