Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-10 19:41:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D874922D057EAC816B5CD7BCAC4E2D078AEB05C88639F20D5EB9FE68A8AF8F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: the author of the above CN lies. The start of his linked paper starts with the disclaimer "Any views expressed here are the author’s and do not represent official views of NOAA or the U.S. government."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844373403542667462
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D874922D057EAC816B5CD7BCAC4E2D078AEB05C88639F20D5EB9FE68A8AF8F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1728589293974
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18443734035426674620D874922D057EAC816B5CD7BCAC4E2D078AEB05C88639F20D5EB9FE68A8AF8F5