Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-11 17:55:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B05F12E4450AD5F3855B521A302D70D9C433808A4D191F1CFD409C93EEE14640
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post states DOJ has (a) reached a settlement for (b) "discriminatory" practices. The parties did reach a settlement, but disagree if the practices violate Title VII (see decree para xv p. 5). If you dislike the legal theory, post a comment. There is nothing misleading here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844344728151633931
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B05F12E4450AD5F3855B521A302D70D9C433808A4D191F1CFD409C93EEE14640
  • createdAtMillis - 1728669349976
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1844344728151633931B05F12E4450AD5F3855B521A302D70D9C433808A4D191F1CFD409C93EEE14640