Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-11 02:56:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DBA1E1C6EC2DCC5613AD7A311408B590898EDFFD7F83CD510AB14D343EB6523C
Participant Details

Original Note:

これは汐街コナ氏により言及されたデマであることがわかっており、発言者当人も撤回しています。 https://togetter.com/li/2356180 実際には有罪判決を受けた服役後、判決を不服として再審請求を行っており、犯行の事実を認めたことも再犯した事実もなく、悪質なデマの再生産です。 https://www.bengo4.com/c_1009/c_19/c_1195/n_2638/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844149569816494414
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DBA1E1C6EC2DCC5613AD7A311408B590898EDFFD7F83CD510AB14D343EB6523C
  • createdAtMillis - 1728615372302
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1844149569816494414DBA1E1C6EC2DCC5613AD7A311408B590898EDFFD7F83CD510AB14D343EB6523C