Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-09 22:15:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 903A70440024572079FE162A22617785EF3A884C9EA6EDEEA3D6CD9FE27EEA64
Participant Details

Original Note:

The hiring practices were not discriminatory, except under the specious doctrine of disparate impact. The average reader will be mislead by this post. Much of the test can be found here: https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1844058406434283824

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844104984054595726
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 903A70440024572079FE162A22617785EF3A884C9EA6EDEEA3D6CD9FE27EEA64
  • createdAtMillis - 1728512159901
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1844104984054595726903A70440024572079FE162A22617785EF3A884C9EA6EDEEA3D6CD9FE27EEA64