Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-09 21:58:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45731F5CD0CD02096F62F7AB1010DE46AB192E86B184BB50AAB0E3855AE662A6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The hiring practices were not discriminatory, except under the specious doctrine of disparate impact. The average reader will be mislead by this post. Much of the test can be found here: https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1844058406434283824

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844104984054595726
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45731F5CD0CD02096F62F7AB1010DE46AB192E86B184BB50AAB0E3855AE662A6
  • createdAtMillis - 1728511104680
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184410498405459572645731F5CD0CD02096F62F7AB1010DE46AB192E86B184BB50AAB0E3855AE662A6