Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-10 08:27:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36AF7E5EB29BCE17F00606003F2B0D56A44CA1E70BA55CFF27C49B7D3EDFA01A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The hiring practices were not discriminatory, except under the specious doctrine of disparate impact. The average reader will be mislead by this post. Much of the test can be found here: https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1844058406434283824

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844104984054595726
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36AF7E5EB29BCE17F00606003F2B0D56A44CA1E70BA55CFF27C49B7D3EDFA01A
  • createdAtMillis - 1728548871124
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184410498405459572636AF7E5EB29BCE17F00606003F2B0D56A44CA1E70BA55CFF27C49B7D3EDFA01A