Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-10 04:29:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D5C9560C840E140B9664BB9CE995FC1382114A3CC5B86F04E4E43175D0CCA6B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The hiring practices were not discriminatory, except under the specious doctrine of disparate impact. The average reader will be mislead by this post. Much of the test can be found here: https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1844058406434283824

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1844104984054595726
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D5C9560C840E140B9664BB9CE995FC1382114A3CC5B86F04E4E43175D0CCA6B
  • createdAtMillis - 1728534569891
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18441049840545957260D5C9560C840E140B9664BB9CE995FC1382114A3CC5B86F04E4E43175D0CCA6B